Mars 2016

For those interested in imaging and image processing with DSLR, CCD, webcam or film.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
DRatledge
Member
Posts: 379
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:27 pm
Location: Adlington
Contact:

Mars 2016

#1 Post by DRatledge » Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:38 am

Had a go at imaging Mars last night (2nd June) at around 10-45. Its altitude was 13 degrees and its position straight over Manchester meant the image was bouncing. I used the ADC at maximum spacing and sure it cancelled out dispersion but it couldn't do anything about the bouncing!

I was amazed that the resulting image ended up round. Not sure what features they are on the planet but it looks like the polar cap must have melted away. It usually does when Mars is at its closest as it is also of course then closest to the Sun.

I selected the best (least worst) 10% of a 5000 frame video taken with a Microsoft LifeCam webcam on my trusty old C8.
Attachments
mars-2june2016.jpg
mars-2june2016.jpg (51.48 KiB) Viewed 5264 times

User avatar
DRatledge
Member
Posts: 379
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:27 pm
Location: Adlington
Contact:

Re: Mars 2016

#2 Post by DRatledge » Sat Jun 04, 2016 8:17 am

You can watch the latest BAA Sky notes by Nick James here:-
https://youtu.be/G9P6AymgC58
Towards the end it covers how hopeless it is to image Mars this year so perhaps getting Mars reasonably round from Lancashire wasn't so bad after all.

User avatar
DRatledge
Member
Posts: 379
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:27 pm
Location: Adlington
Contact:

Re: Mars 2016

#3 Post by DRatledge » Sat Jun 04, 2016 4:48 pm

Astronomy Now has a Mars Mapper which gives a simulated view of Mars for any date and time.
The features actually match up well - if you squint a bit!
Attachments
mars-simulation.jpg
mars-simulation.jpg (22.45 KiB) Viewed 5239 times

User avatar
rwilkinson
Member
Posts: 1284
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 6:47 pm
Location: Bolton
Contact:

Re: Mars 2016

#4 Post by rwilkinson » Thu Jun 09, 2016 8:12 am

I had a go at imaging Mars myself last night. I don't have any atmospheric dispersion-compensation, but the seeing was very good last night, due to the still air:
mars_20160608_2216.png
My image of Mars alongside the Mars Mapper graphic
mars_20160608_2216.png (171.77 KiB) Viewed 5432 times
Note that I've flipped the Mars Mapper image to put North at the top, to match my image.

I was using my Philips webcam (running in "colour-raw" mode) on my Celestron C8 fitted with a Parks Optics Barlow-lens (operating at around f/35). I collected a 300-frame .AVI file using wxAstroCapture and then stacked this in AutoStakkert and exported the .TIF into IRIS for wavelet processing.

User avatar
rwilkinson
Member
Posts: 1284
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 6:47 pm
Location: Bolton
Contact:

Re: Mars 2016

#5 Post by rwilkinson » Thu Jun 09, 2016 9:27 am

I was surprised to find that my first image-sequence (from 15 minutes earlier) gave a better result than the later one:
mars_20160608_2201.png
mars_20160608_2201.png (139.76 KiB) Viewed 5430 times
Usually it's the case that things get better as the night progresses (as the target gets higher in the sky, and the air-currents inside my optical tube settle down), but perhaps this time things were reversed as Mars moved into the warm air rising from my neighbours' roof?

User avatar
DRatledge
Member
Posts: 379
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:27 pm
Location: Adlington
Contact:

Re: Mars 2016

#6 Post by DRatledge » Mon Jun 13, 2016 10:29 am

Well done Ross. It looks like seeing is more important than dispersion. It needs a warm balmy night.

Post Reply