It is currently Wed May 23, 2018 10:34 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Grainy images
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2015 1:41 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 7:20 am
Posts: 112
Location: Atherton
I'm wondering whether either of these settings affect the amount of grain in my images processed in IRIS.
1: What should the normalization value be for 14 bit RAW files. (can't find it on the WEB)
2: Polynomial v Local estimator. Which is best and does it influence grain?
Thanks for any advice re grain. Bill C


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Grainy images
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2015 2:54 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 6:47 pm
Posts: 1250
Location: Bolton
In his tutorial (http://www.astrosurf.com/buil/iris/tutorial3/doc13_us.htm) Christian Buil (the author of IRIS) recommended a normalisation value of 5000 for 12-bit data (i.e. 4096 levels), but perhaps it should be different for 14-bits (16384 levels)?
Buil suggests running the STAT command to check the maximum pixel intensity of an image (this must be kept below 32767 to avoid saturation). So check your calibrated images (i.e. after offset, dark & flat correction, but before CFA conversion) and if your "Maxi:" value is anywhere near this limit, try a different normalisation value?
If you do hit this limit, you'll saturate the brightest parts of your image (i.e. stars), and so compress the overall signal-to-noise ratio.

I can't see how any gradient reduction process could create small-scale "grainy" artefacts in the image background (unless maybe you used a very small value of computation area in the local estimator?).

But remember that your images start as 14-bit RAWs, and IRIS processing operates in a 16-bit enviroment, so make sure that you've not inadvertently truncated down to 8-bit resolution (i.e. only 256 levels in each colour-plane) when transporting your data between the other post-processing programs which you use.
The reduction to 8-bit JPEG should only be done at the very last stage (if you need to reduce the file-size to upload to the web-site).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Grainy images
PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2015 12:58 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 370
Location: Adlington
Bill,
I assume you mean normalisation value for making flats? As Ross says the default of 5000 is set for 12 bit images. For 14-bit images I use 8000 - being the half value. The exception is narrowband hydrogen alpha images - I use 800 for that. It shouldn't noticeably effect graininess.

Light pollution removal - every image is different - sometimes Polynomial works best - sometimes Local Estimator work best. I always try both and use a mask.

Light pollution removal subtracts a smooth light pollution pattern. But the light pollution we have recorded in our image is not smooth - at each pixel there is a random variation - this is called noise. It is why our images from Lancashire are much noisier than those from a dark sky. It is a cross we have to bear and I keep asking myself - why have I not moved to Norfolk?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group