A new telescope for Christmas!

Reviews and questions about new and old equipment.
Share with us your latest purchase or discuss equipment that you are currently using
Post Reply
User avatar
rwilkinson
Member
Posts: 1342
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 6:47 pm
Location: Bolton

A new telescope for Christmas!

Post by rwilkinson » Fri Dec 20, 2013 8:52 am

Although I'd bought five different telescopes between 2001-3, I only kept one of them (the Celestron C8), so I've decided that after ten years maybe it's time to treat myself to a new 'scope?

Now SCTs are great instruments for visual observing and planetary imaging, but are not well-suited for imaging larger objects: even with an f/3.3 focal reducer my C8's focal length is around 700mm, and the field-of-view with a small (webcam) CCD is a mere 20 arc-minutes across.
But recently I've been doing some experiments with a little 80mm f/5 refractor borrowed from a friend. With a focal length of only 400mm it gives a much wider field (albeit with a fainter image), but it's just a low-cost achromat, so it can't provide really sharp results.

So I've been looking for a better-quality refractor - I was thinking of a compact 70mm APO, but this week I found an almost-new StarWave 80ED 80mm f/6.9 which was not much dearer. This is identical to the one which the Society bought in March 2012, and I was impressed when I looked through that (although I've never managed to try any imaging with it).
Anyway, it was delivered yesterday (Christmas came early!) and I soon had it set up pointing through an upstairs window at Bolton Town Hall clock (about a mile away). This enabled me to do some daylight tests with the webcam, and I found that I could achieve focus through my Celestron 0.63 focal reducer (designed for the C8), giving me an f/4.6 system with an effective focal length of around 365mm. This should yield a field-of-view around 43 arc-min across - about four times the area which I can get with my SCT operating at f/3.3.
clock_f6.9.jpg
Webcam image from prime focus (f/6.9)
Taken through a double-glazed window, and with lots of trees in the way!
clock_f6.9.jpg (21.88 KiB) Viewed 7363 times
clock_f4.6.jpg
Webcam image through focal reducer (f/4.6)
clock_f4.6.jpg (23.18 KiB) Viewed 7363 times
But then after 7pm the clouds started to break up, so I was able to try it outside (whatever happened to "the curse of the new telescope" weather?). I mounted it on my CG5 AGT and had a look at the Double Cluster, the Pleiades, Mizar & Alcor and the Trapezium (in M42). Then once they had risen above the trees, I could focus on the Moon and Jupiter through a 6.5m eyepiece. I was impressed with the clarity of the views, and the wide field made it much easier to find targets with my "Go-Near" system. Although it has a smaller aperture and focal length than my C8, it gave a really good view of Jupiter at high magnification - the benefit of looking through a smaller column of air?

And finally after 8:30 all the clouds disappeared, so I fitted the mono webcam and filter-wheel and collected some images of M42 through four different filters. I also managed to get some images using my original colour webcam, before the 'scope started to dew up and the clouds returned; so I've got plenty of data to play with over Christmas. And I need to sort out a finderscope for it (I have an old Celestron 6x30 which should do) and make a Bahtinov mask and dew-heater - yet more jobs for the Christmas holidays!

cstone
Member
Posts: 162
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:07 pm
Location: Bury

Re: A new telescope for Christmas!

Post by cstone » Fri Dec 20, 2013 10:49 am

Well done Ross. :)
Celestron 11" Telescope
Eq6 Pro Mount
Eq5 Mount
EQ Mod
QHY5 Guide camera
Cannon 1000D SLR Camera

I choose to image with an 11" SCT Celestron in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard......

dean_kos

Re: A new telescope for Christmas!

Post by dean_kos » Fri Dec 20, 2013 6:18 pm

My word Ross you had a busy day ;)

Time to get busy with the cardboard and scissors now then eh 8-)

Amartin

Re: A new telescope for Christmas!

Post by Amartin » Sun Dec 22, 2013 10:42 am

Welcome to the APO club Ross!

User avatar
rwilkinson
Member
Posts: 1342
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 6:47 pm
Location: Bolton

Bahtinov mask for 80ED

Post by rwilkinson » Mon Dec 23, 2013 11:01 am

dean_kos wrote:Time to get busy with the cardboard and scissors now then eh 8-)
No Dean, this time I've used plastic card (from the model shop) and a craft-knife, so the result is more robust and won't go floppy on damp evenings:
bahtinov.jpg
A home-made Bahtinov mask for the 80ED
bahtinov.jpg (157.26 KiB) Viewed 7323 times

User avatar
rwilkinson
Member
Posts: 1342
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 6:47 pm
Location: Bolton

Further tests with StarWave 80ED

Post by rwilkinson » Mon Dec 23, 2013 11:45 am

Amazingly, two of the four evenings which have passed since I got my new 'scope have been clear (at least partly) - what a good job I didn't leave it wrapped up under the tree! ;)
sw80imaging_small.jpg
Al-fresco imaging with StarWave 80ED on Celestron CG5-AGT mount, using a monochrome webcam with filter-wheel and Celestron 0.63 focal reducer.
sw80imaging_small.jpg (180.01 KiB) Viewed 7321 times
So last night I was able to try out my newly-made Bahtinov mask, using Bellatrix as the target.
First with the Hydrogen-Alpha (red) filter it was really clear, but not so good with the Oxygen-III (green) and then when I tried the blue filter, the diffraction patten was really indistinct:
bellatrix_b.jpg
Trying to focus on Bellatrix through the blue filter.
bellatrix_b.jpg (11.32 KiB) Viewed 7321 times
So recalling Dave's advice that the ED 'scopes may not be so well-corrected for the short wavelengths (violet), I got out my old Baader "contrast-booster" filter (aka "minus violet") and put that in-line too. That made a big difference:
bellatrix_b_minusv.jpg
Focussing on Bellatrix through the same blue filter, but with the Baader "contrast booster" in-line too.
bellatrix_b_minusv.jpg (10.63 KiB) Viewed 7321 times
The improvement can also be seen by comparing these two images of M42, both taken through the blue filter:
m42_b.jpg
Single 20-sec image of M42 through the blue filter.
m42_b.jpg (127.85 KiB) Viewed 7321 times
m42_b_minusv.jpg
Single 20-sec image of M42 using blue and "contrast-booster" filters.
m42_b_minusv.jpg (107.76 KiB) Viewed 7321 times
Now the stars aren't "bloated", and there's more detail in the nebula too.

Post Reply