Deep Sky - First attempt

For those interested in imaging and image processing with DSLR, CCD, webcam or film.
Message
Author
dean_kos

Re: Deep Sky - First attempt

#11 Post by dean_kos » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:47 pm

Well done Bill, not bad at all, even colour in the ring nebula...... As dave mentioned, just fine tune your focus an you've cracked it......... :roll:

User avatar
bbones
Member
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:26 pm
Location: Horwich

Re: Deep Sky - First attempt

#12 Post by bbones » Sat Jun 23, 2012 10:01 am

Hi Guys

Thanks for all the support and help, As David said, its not easy but well worth all the effort.

Yep capturing in RAW, I just need to consecrate on getting my focus sorted. All these years of taking pictures and can't focus :lol:

I taken a look at IRIS :roll: me thinks this is going to be hard work.

Once again, thanks for all the help

Regards

Bill
SkyWatcher HEQ5
Sky-Scan EQ3-2
Celestron C8
SkyWatcher 80ED Apro
Sky-Watcher Skymax-127 SynScan AZ GOTO
Canon 600D
Canon 400D
Opticstar PX-35C COOLAIR CCD camera

User avatar
DRatledge
Member
Posts: 379
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:27 pm
Location: Adlington
Contact:

Re: Deep Sky - First attempt

#13 Post by DRatledge » Sat Jun 23, 2012 6:15 pm

Bill,
The plan is to use IRIS at the next imaging workshop on the 17th July - show how to calibrate deep-sky images and then process them. IRIS is not the easiest to understand but it has many routines applicable to imaging from light-polluted sites such as Lancashire.

mhall

Re: Deep Sky - First attempt

#14 Post by mhall » Mon Jun 25, 2012 11:16 pm

Good work.

Do these clusters have spiral arms? The image i took of m13 and your m3 look like they do.

dean_kos

Re: Deep Sky - First attempt

#15 Post by dean_kos » Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:04 am

In short no. clusters dont have spiral arms, galaxies have them but not clusters.

User avatar
bbones
Member
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:26 pm
Location: Horwich

Re: Deep Sky - First attempt

#16 Post by bbones » Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:34 am

Thanks Dean, I was trying to think of the correct description ;)
SkyWatcher HEQ5
Sky-Scan EQ3-2
Celestron C8
SkyWatcher 80ED Apro
Sky-Watcher Skymax-127 SynScan AZ GOTO
Canon 600D
Canon 400D
Opticstar PX-35C COOLAIR CCD camera

User avatar
bbones
Member
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:26 pm
Location: Horwich

Re: Deep Sky - First attempt

#17 Post by bbones » Sat Jun 30, 2012 5:40 pm

Not easy at all

My second attempt, If have go the file in order it's the Great Cluster in Hercules M13. shot with my Sky-Watcher Skymax-127 and a 600D

I have dropped in the Gallery

Could not get the RGB balance to work so ran it through NET.PAINT

Any comments would be appreciated

Bill
SkyWatcher HEQ5
Sky-Scan EQ3-2
Celestron C8
SkyWatcher 80ED Apro
Sky-Watcher Skymax-127 SynScan AZ GOTO
Canon 600D
Canon 400D
Opticstar PX-35C COOLAIR CCD camera

User avatar
DRatledge
Member
Posts: 379
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:27 pm
Location: Adlington
Contact:

Re: Deep Sky - First attempt

#18 Post by DRatledge » Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:27 am

Bill,
White balance is not easy and I often find what I thought was correct then the following day looks way off. In IRIS you can just set the RGB numbers and keep trying. For my set-up with a modded 40D with a light pollution filter then the RGB numbers are around 1.2/1/1.8. If your Canon is not modded then then the R needs to be much higher - perhaps over 2. An alternative is to use the black and white commands. The former sets the background balance to black and the latter can be used on a known white star or say the centre of M13 to set white correctly. You need to drag a small square over the area and type the command in. I generally use all the methods in conjunction and still struggle!

User avatar
bbones
Member
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:26 pm
Location: Horwich

Re: Deep Sky - First attempt

#19 Post by bbones » Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:51 am

David

Well you did say this was not going to be easy ;) I will have another go later and see what results I get. I have also used DeepSkyStacker to evaluate it.

Anyway the good news is that I seem to be getting better, just need to sort out the light pollution and the exposure.

Cheers

Bill
SkyWatcher HEQ5
Sky-Scan EQ3-2
Celestron C8
SkyWatcher 80ED Apro
Sky-Watcher Skymax-127 SynScan AZ GOTO
Canon 600D
Canon 400D
Opticstar PX-35C COOLAIR CCD camera

User avatar
bbones
Member
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:26 pm
Location: Horwich

Re: Deep Sky - First attempt

#20 Post by bbones » Sun Jul 01, 2012 11:44 am

David

Gone through the process again up to the RGB balance and I'm not having much look as no matter what settings I use and they try to correct them I'm having no luck, even if I enter the original figure it does not take me back to the original,

I will keep trying but looking forward to your tutorial, even read in Astronomy Now mag that you did a presentation at the North West Group of Astronomical Societies meeting on the same subject with the title of Veteran ;)

Well I have just turned 65 and a baby at this :lol:

Regards

Bill
SkyWatcher HEQ5
Sky-Scan EQ3-2
Celestron C8
SkyWatcher 80ED Apro
Sky-Watcher Skymax-127 SynScan AZ GOTO
Canon 600D
Canon 400D
Opticstar PX-35C COOLAIR CCD camera

Post Reply